Kriete Truck Center Madison, Inc. has found itself embroiled in a legal battle over the identity of its debtor, with significant implications for the enforceability of a longstanding judgment. On February 10, 2026, the Court of Appeals in Wisconsin reversed a lower court’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings. The case revolves around a default judgment Kriete obtained against “William G. Wickman” for unpaid commercial truck repairs dating back to 2004.
The plaintiff, Kriete Truck Center Madison, Inc., filed its complaint in Lincoln County Circuit Court on March 26, 2024, naming William G. Wickman as the defendant. However, the individual who took his truck to Kriete for repairs claims that he is not “William G. Wickman,” but rather “William G. Wickman III.” This discrepancy has led to an appeal by Wickman III, arguing that he was incorrectly named in Kriete’s summons and complaint and that the circuit court lacked personal jurisdiction over him.
Wickman’s appeal centers on three key arguments: First, he asserts that there is a fundamental defect in the summons and complaint because they do not correctly name him as a defendant. He contends that his legal name is “William G. Wickman III,” while his grandfather’s name is “William G. Wickman.” Second, he argues that Kriete cannot enforce a judgment against someone other than the original judgment debtor—namely himself as “William G. Wickman III.” Third, he claims that any action against him is barred by the statute of limitations since no claims have been brought against him or his company within the required timeframe.
The Court of Appeals found merit in Wickman’s argument regarding personal jurisdiction due to the naming issue and determined that this constituted a fundamental defect similar to previous cases where incorrect naming deprived courts of jurisdiction over defendants. The court noted that there was an unresolved factual dispute about whether Wickman’s legal name was indeed “William G. Wickman III,” which necessitated further proceedings.
Kriete Truck Center seeks to enforce its rights under a September 30, 2004 judgment amounting to $17,703.64 plus interest and costs totaling $59,631.20 by March 2024 when they filed their current action. They argue there was no confusion about whom they intended to sue since only one William G. Wickman had dealings with them regarding truck repairs.
The attorneys involved include counsel for both parties; however specific names are not provided within this document excerpt aside from Judge Rick T Cveykus who presided over initial circuit court proceedings before being reversed by Judges Stark P.J., Hruz J., and Gill J., all partaking in appellate review under Case ID No:2024AP1667
Source: 2024AP1667_Kriete_Truck_Center_Madison_Inc_v_Wickman_Opinion_Wisconsin_Court_of_Appeals.pdf
